Movie Analysis- Charlotte Sometimes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Movie Analysis- Charlotte Sometimes - Essay Example Indeed, King highlights that the narrative of the independent film often subverts genre, thereby heightening viewer empathy with characters in contrast to the Hollywood approach, which would support the Warhol perception of independent film (King, 2005). The focus of this analysis is to critically evaluate the independent film â€Å"Charlotte Sometimes† (2002) and in doing so this paper will undertake a contextual analysis of the film in context of the independent film format. Firstly, it is submitted that the Eric Byler’s film Charlotte Sometimes utilises the signature independent film technique of subversion of the formulaic Hollywood approach in narrative and characterisation. To this end, it is posited that this is a significant feature of the appeal of the film, as the subversion of the Hollywood approach through the use of complex narratives and anti-stereotypical characterisation symbolises the rise of the wider demographic and the growing development of independent cinema. By analogy, this is further highlighted by the overlap of nominated films at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and the Independent Feature Project Stage and the Academy Awards and the Independent Spirit Wards (Sconce, 2002). For example, in 2006, Ang Lee won both the Oscar and the Spirit award for the direction in Brokeback Mountain, arguably obfuscating the distinction between independent films and Hollywood films with the â€Å"indiewood† effect (Tzioumakis, 2006). However, Rombes argues that â€Å"the coincidence of films does point to a phenomenon in contemporary (particularly) American filmmaking, which is yet to be critically evaluated in any sustained way† (Rombes, 2005). Indeed, Nicholas Rombes’ collection of essays further develops this point by addressing contemporary film culture and raises the possibility of the evolvement of socio-political conceptualisation through what he terms as a â€Å"cinematic avant garde†, which attracts